The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

K2 Horizon 3.7B vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

K2 Horizon 3.7B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched at 21.4 and 19.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

Institute of Foundation Models · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

K2 Horizon 3.7B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 21.4 and 19.7.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose K2 Horizon 3.7B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
21.4
#215
19.7
#231
20.2
#217
18.6
#237
9.7
#152
9.4
#153
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
K2 Horizon 3.7B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
13.3#245
19.5#181
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for K2 Horizon 3.7B · 45 for Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

1 shared

K2 Horizon 3.7B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Fri Oct 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

29.3B diff

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has 29.3B more parameters than K2 Horizon 3.7B, making it 791.9% larger.

Institute of Foundation Models
K2 Horizon 3.7B
3.7Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
33.0Bparameters
3.7B
K2 Horizon 3.7B
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas K2 Horizon 3.7B does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

K2 Horizon 3.7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

K2 Horizon 3.7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

K2 Horizon 3.7B was released on 2026-09-03, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

K2 Horizon 3.7B is 12 months newer than Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

K2 Horizon 3.7B

Sep 3, 2026

1 months ago

11mo newer
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against K2 Horizon 3.7B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

K2 Horizon 3.7B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about K2 Horizon 3.7B vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, K2 Horizon 3.7B or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

K2 Horizon 3.7B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 21.4 and 19.7. K2 Horizon 3.7B is made by Institute of Foundation Models and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does K2 Horizon 3.7B compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

K2 Horizon 3.7B scores HMMT Feb 26: 75.2%, GPQA: 68.9%, SWE-Bench Verified: 65.6%, BFCL-V4: 64.6%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 39.7%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the main differences between K2 Horizon 3.7B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (21.4 vs 19.7), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes K2 Horizon 3.7B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

K2 Horizon 3.7B is developed by Institute of Foundation Models and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.