The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

K2 Horizon 7B vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

K2 Horizon 7B and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 are closely matched at 25.7 and 27.5 on the LLM Stats Score.

Institute of Foundation Models · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

K2 Horizon 7B and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 25.7 and 27.5.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, K2 Horizon 7B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose K2 Horizon 7B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $3.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
25.7
#184
27.5
#169
25.6
#181
27.8
#161
12.0
#133
11.3
#142
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.00 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
K2 Horizon 7B
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
14.4#235
31.2#77
8.4#164
10.2#149
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for K2 Horizon 7B · 25 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

1 shared

K2 Horizon 7B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is better at 0 benchmarks.

K2 Horizon 7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

228.0B diff

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 has 228.0B more parameters than K2 Horizon 7B, making it 3257.1% larger.

Institute of Foundation Models
K2 Horizon 7B
7.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
235.0Bparameters
7.0B
K2 Horizon 7B
235.0B
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Institute of Foundation Models
K2 Horizon 7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Oct 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

K2 Horizon 7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

K2 Horizon 7B was released on 2026-09-03, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 was released on 2025-07-25.

K2 Horizon 7B is 14 months newer than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.

K2 Horizon 7B

Sep 3, 2026

1 months ago

1.1yr newer
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Jul 25, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against K2 Horizon 7B and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

K2 Horizon 7B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about K2 Horizon 7B vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.

Which is better, K2 Horizon 7B or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

K2 Horizon 7B and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 25.7 and 27.5. K2 Horizon 7B is made by Institute of Foundation Models and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does K2 Horizon 7B compare to Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 in benchmarks?

K2 Horizon 7B scores HMMT Feb 26: 73.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 70.6%, AA-LCR: 68.0%, BrowseComp: 59.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 39.1%. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.8%, AIME 2025: 92.3%, WritingBench: 88.3%, IFEval: 87.8%, Creative Writing v3: 86.1%.

What are the context window sizes for K2 Horizon 7B and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

K2 Horizon 7B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between K2 Horizon 7B and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (25.7 vs 27.5). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes K2 Horizon 7B and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

K2 Horizon 7B is developed by Institute of Foundation Models and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.