The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi-k1.5 vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Kimi-k1.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) are closely matched at 17.1 and 11.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

Moonshot AI · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi-k1.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 17.1 and 11.2.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi-k1.5

  • you are already invested in the Moonshot AI ecosystem

Choose Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
17.1
#234
11.2
#275
16.4
#231
11.4
#270
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Context window
—
131,100

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Kimi-k1.5
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
20.2#166
12.8#237
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Kimi-k1.5 · 4 for Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

1 shared

Kimi-k1.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Wed Oct 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) specifies input context (131,100 tokens). Only Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) specifies output context (131,100 tokens).

Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input131,100 tokens
Output131,100 tokens
Wed Oct 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Kimi-k1.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Kimi-k1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi-k1.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi-k1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi-k1.5 was released on 2025-01-20, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) was released on 2025-12-04.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 11 months newer than Kimi-k1.5.

Kimi-k1.5

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Dec 4, 2025

10 months ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi-k1.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi-k1.5
✓ Preferred
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi-k1.5 vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).

Which is better, Kimi-k1.5 or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Kimi-k1.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 17.1 and 11.2. Kimi-k1.5 is made by Moonshot AI and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Kimi-k1.5 compare to Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) in benchmarks?

Kimi-k1.5 scores MATH-500: 96.2%, CLUEWSC: 91.4%, C-Eval: 88.3%, MMLU: 87.4%, IFEval: 87.2%. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) scores AIME 2024: 77.5%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 54.8%, GPQA: 53.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi-k1.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Kimi-k1.5 supports an unknown number of tokens and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi-k1.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (17.1 vs 11.2), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi-k1.5 and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Kimi-k1.5 is developed by Moonshot AI and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is developed by Mistral AI.