The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi-k1.5 vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Kimi-k1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Moonshot AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi-k1.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks. Kimi-k1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi-k1.5

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
Released
Jan 2025
Sep 2024
License
Proprietary
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Kimi-k1.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Kimi-k1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not.

Kimi-k1.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Kimi-k1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi-k1.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi-k1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi-k1.5 was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Kimi-k1.5 is 4 months newer than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Kimi-k1.5

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

4mo newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi-k1.5 and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi-k1.5
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi-k1.5 vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Which is better, Kimi-k1.5 or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Kimi-k1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi-k1.5 is made by Moonshot AI and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Kimi-k1.5 compare to Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in benchmarks?

Kimi-k1.5 scores MATH-500: 96.2%, CLUEWSC: 91.4%, C-Eval: 88.3%, MMLU: 87.4%, IFEval: 87.2%. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores GSM8k: 94.8%, HumanEval: 83.5%, MBPP: 82.0%, MATH: 80.0%, MMLU-Redux: 80.0%.

What are the main differences between Kimi-k1.5 and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi-k1.5 and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Kimi-k1.5 is developed by Moonshot AI and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.