The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi-k1.5 vs Step3-VL-10B

Step3-VL-10B leads the LLM Stats Score 26.1 to 17.3.

Moonshot AI · StepFun · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Step3-VL-10B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 26.1 to 17.3, ranking #143 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Step3-VL-10B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi-k1.5

  • you are already invested in the Moonshot AI ecosystem

Choose Step3-VL-10B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 26.1 and ranks #143 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
17.3
#205
26.1
#143
16.5
#203
25.9
#140
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Kimi-k1.5
Step3-VL-10B
20.5#150
23.9#121
11.5#106
17.1#81
15.3#86
20.9#63
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Kimi-k1.5 · 6 for Step3-VL-10B

2 shared

Kimi-k1.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Step3-VL-10B is better at 2 benchmarks (MathVista, MMMU).

Step3-VL-10B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Kimi-k1.5 and Step3-VL-10B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Kimi-k1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Step3-VL-10B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi-k1.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Step3-VL-10B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi-k1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Step3-VL-10B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi-k1.5 was released on 2025-01-20, while Step3-VL-10B was released on 2026-01-15.

Step3-VL-10B is 12 months newer than Kimi-k1.5.

Kimi-k1.5

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

Step3-VL-10B

Jan 15, 2026

7 months ago

12mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi-k1.5 and Step3-VL-10B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi-k1.5
✓ Preferred
Step3-VL-10B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi-k1.5 vs Step3-VL-10B.

Which is better, Kimi-k1.5 or Step3-VL-10B?

Step3-VL-10B leads the LLM Stats Score 26.1 to 17.3. Kimi-k1.5 is made by Moonshot AI and Step3-VL-10B is made by StepFun. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Kimi-k1.5 compare to Step3-VL-10B in benchmarks?

Kimi-k1.5 scores MATH-500: 96.2%, CLUEWSC: 91.4%, C-Eval: 88.3%, MMLU: 87.4%, IFEval: 87.2%. Step3-VL-10B scores MMBench: 91.8%, AIME 2025: 87.7%, MathVista: 84.0%, MMMU: 78.1%, MathVision: 70.8%.

What are the main differences between Kimi-k1.5 and Step3-VL-10B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (17.3 vs 26.1), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi-k1.5 and Step3-VL-10B?

Kimi-k1.5 is developed by Moonshot AI and Step3-VL-10B is developed by StepFun.