The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi K2 Base vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Kimi K2 Base leads the LLM Stats Score 13.6 to 5.3.

Moonshot AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi K2 Base leads the overall LLM Stats Score 13.6 to 5.3, ranking #233 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi K2 Base wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi K2 Base

  • overall performance matters — it scores 13.6 and ranks #233 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2025

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
13.6
#233
5.3
#286
12.8
#231
1.6
#298
10.7
#155
1.2
#226
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Kimi K2 Base
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
14.6#211
5.5#264
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Kimi K2 Base · 45 for Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

4 shared

Kimi K2 Base outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, GSM8k, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 1 benchmark (MATH).

Kimi K2 Base shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

993.0B diff

Kimi K2 Base has 993.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B, making it 14185.7% larger.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base
1.0Tparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
7.0Bparameters
1000.0B
Kimi K2 Base
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Kimi K2 Base does not.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Kimi K2 Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi K2 Base is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi K2 Base

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2 Base was released on 2025-07-11, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Kimi K2 Base is 4 months newer than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Kimi K2 Base

Jul 11, 2025

1.2 years ago

3mo newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K2 Base and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K2 Base
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2 Base vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, Kimi K2 Base or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Kimi K2 Base leads the LLM Stats Score 13.6 to 5.3. Kimi K2 Base is made by Moonshot AI and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Kimi K2 Base compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

Kimi K2 Base scores C-Eval: 92.5%, GSM8k: 92.1%, MMLU-redux-2.0: 90.2%, MMLU: 87.8%, TriviaQA: 85.1%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the main differences between Kimi K2 Base and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.6 vs 5.3), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K2 Base and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Kimi K2 Base is developed by Moonshot AI and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.