Kimi K2 Instruct vs MiniMax M1 80K
Kimi K2 Instruct and MiniMax M1 80K are closely matched at 21.9 and 21.4 on the LLM Stats Score. Kimi K2 Instruct is 1.9x cheaper per token.
Moonshot AI · MiniMax · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Kimi K2 Instruct and MiniMax M1 80K are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 21.9 and 21.4.
In the 9 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi K2 Instruct wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Kimi K2 Instruct is roughly 1.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
MiniMax M1 80K also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Kimi K2 Instruct
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 9 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 1.9x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2025
Choose MiniMax M1 80K
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
38 reported for Kimi K2 Instruct · 16 for MiniMax M1 80K
Kimi K2 Instruct outperforms in 5 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH-500, Multi-Challenge, SimpleQA, ZebraLogic), while MiniMax M1 80K is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025, Humanity's Last Exam).
Kimi K2 Instruct has a slight edge in benchmark performance.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Kimi K2 Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than MiniMax M1 80K ($0.55/1M tokens).
For output processing, Kimi K2 Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens) is 4.4x cheaper than MiniMax M1 80K ($2.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, MiniMax M1 80K is more expensive than Kimi K2 Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct has 544.0B more parameters than MiniMax M1 80K, making it 119.3% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
MiniMax M1 80K accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Kimi K2 Instruct's 200,000 tokens. Kimi K2 Instruct can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while MiniMax M1 80K is limited to 40,000 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under MIT.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
MIT
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Kimi K2 Instruct was released on 2025-07-11, while MiniMax M1 80K was released on 2025-06-16.
Kimi K2 Instruct is 1 month newer than MiniMax M1 80K.
Jul 11, 2025
1.2 years ago
3w newerJun 16, 2025
1.3 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Kimi K2 Instruct is available from Fireworks, Novita. MiniMax M1 80K is available from Novita.
Kimi K2 Instruct
MiniMax M1 80K
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Kimi K2 Instruct and MiniMax M1 80K side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Kimi K2 Instruct vs MiniMax M1 80K.