The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi K2.8 Preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Comparing Kimi K2.8 Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Moonshot AI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi K2.8 Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Kimi K2.8 Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi K2.8 Preview

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Kimi K2.8 Preview
Moonshot AI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
1,048,576
262,144

Individual benchmarks

0 reported for Kimi K2.8 Preview · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

No common benchmarks found

Kimi K2.8 Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Findon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K2.8 Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's 262,144 tokens. Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.8 Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Kimi K2.8 Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.

Kimi K2.8 Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2.8 Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Kimi K2.8 Preview is 0 month newer than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Sep 11, 2026

3 days ago

1w newer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

1 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Kimi K2.8 Preview is available from Moonshot AI. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K2.8 Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K2.8 Preview
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2.8 Preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, Kimi K2.8 Preview or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Kimi K2.8 Preview (Moonshot AI) and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (InclusionAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Kimi K2.8 Preview compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K2.8 Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Kimi K2.8 Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K2.8 Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 262K), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K2.8 Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Kimi K2.8 Preview is developed by Moonshot AI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons