Model Comparison

Kimi K3 vs MedGemma 4B ITWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing Kimi K3 and MedGemma 4B IT across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Kimi K3 vs MedGemma 4B IT — which is better?

Kimi K3 (by Moonshot AI) and MedGemma 4B IT (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose MedGemma 4B IT if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Kimi K3 and MedGemma 4B ITdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2795.7B diff

Kimi K3 has 2795.7B more parameters than MedGemma 4B IT, making it 65016.3% larger.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
2.8Tparameters
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
4.3Bparameters
2800.0B
Kimi K3
4.3B
MedGemma 4B IT

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Kimi K3 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Kimi K3 specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Jul 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Kimi K3 and MedGemma 4B IT support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Kimi K3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MedGemma 4B IT

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K3 was released on 2026-07-16, while MedGemma 4B IT was released on 2025-05-20.

Kimi K3 is 14 months newer than MedGemma 4B IT.

Kimi K3

Jul 16, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.2yr newer
MedGemma 4B IT

May 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Moonshot AI
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K3 and MedGemma 4B IT side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K3
✓ Preferred
MedGemma 4B IT
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Google
MedGemma 4B IT

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K3 vs MedGemma 4B IT.

Which is better, Kimi K3 or MedGemma 4B IT?

Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI) and MedGemma 4B IT (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Kimi K3 compare to MedGemma 4B IT in benchmarks?

Kimi K3 scores MathVision: 97.8%, DeepSearchQA: 95.0%, GPQA: 93.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.3%, BrowseComp: 91.2%. MedGemma 4B IT scores MIMIC CXR: 88.9%, DermMCQA: 71.8%, PathMCQA: 69.8%, SlakeVQA: 62.3%, VQA-Rad: 49.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K3 and MedGemma 4B IT?

Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens and MedGemma 4B IT supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K3 and MedGemma 4B IT?

Key differences include licensing (Unknown vs Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K3 and MedGemma 4B IT?

Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI and MedGemma 4B IT is developed by Google.

Related comparisons