Model Comparison

Kimi K3 vs o1Which is better in 2026?

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi K3 is 4.4x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Kimi K3 vs o1 — which is better?

Kimi K3 (by Moonshot AI) and o1 (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Kimi K3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while o1 is better at 0 benchmarks. Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Kimi K3 is roughly 4.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Kimi K3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 4.4x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose o1 if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Kimi K3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while o1 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Kimi K3 costs less

For input processing, Kimi K3 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than o1 ($15.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Kimi K3 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 4.0x cheaper than o1 ($60.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o1 is more expensive than Kimi K3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
OpenAI
o1
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to o1's 200,000 tokens. Kimi K3 can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while o1 is limited to 100,000 tokens.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
OpenAI
o1
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Kimi K3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1 does not.

Kimi K3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Kimi K3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K3 was released on 2026-07-16, while o1 was released on 2024-12-17.

Kimi K3 is 19 months newer than o1.

Kimi K3

Jul 16, 2026

2 days ago

1.6yr newer
o1

Dec 17, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Kimi K3 is available from Moonshot AI. o1 is available from Azure, OpenAI.

Kimi K3

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

o1

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (93.5% vs 78.0%)

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K3 and o1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K3
✓ Preferred
o1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
OpenAI
o1

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K3 vs o1.

Which is better, Kimi K3 or o1?

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI and o1 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Kimi K3 compare to o1 in benchmarks?

Kimi K3 scores MathVision: 97.8%, DeepSearchQA: 95.0%, GPQA: 93.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.3%, BrowseComp: 91.2%. o1 scores GSM8k: 97.1%, MATH: 96.4%, GPQA Physics: 92.8%, MMLU: 91.8%, MGSM: 89.3%.

Is Kimi K3 cheaper than o1?

Kimi K3 is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Kimi K3 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via moonshot. o1 costs $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output via azure.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K3 and o1?

Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens and o1 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K3 and o1?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 200K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $15.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K3 and o1?

Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI and o1 is developed by OpenAI.