Model Comparison

Kimi K3 vs o4-miniWhich is better in 2026?

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. o4-mini is 3.1x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Kimi K3 vs o4-mini — which is better?

Kimi K3 (by Moonshot AI) and o4-mini (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Kimi K3 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (BrowseComp, CharXiv-R, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while o4-mini is better at 0 benchmarks. Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, o4-mini is roughly 3.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Kimi K3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose o4-mini if…

  • cost matters — it's about 3.1x cheaper per token

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Kimi K3 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (BrowseComp, CharXiv-R, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while o4-mini is better at 0 benchmarks.

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

o4-mini costs less

For input processing, Kimi K3 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 2.7x more expensive than o4-mini ($1.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Kimi K3 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 3.4x more expensive than o4-mini ($4.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K3 is more expensive than o4-mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
OpenAI
o4-mini
Input tokens$1.10
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to o4-mini's 200,000 tokens. Kimi K3 can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while o4-mini is limited to 100,000 tokens.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
OpenAI
o4-mini
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Kimi K3 and o4-mini support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Kimi K3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o4-mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K3 was released on 2026-07-16, while o4-mini was released on 2025-04-16.

Kimi K3 is 15 months newer than o4-mini.

Kimi K3

Jul 16, 2026

2 days ago

1.2yr newer
o4-mini

Apr 16, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o4-mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Kimi K3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o4-mini's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Kimi K3's cutoff date.

Kimi K3

o4-mini

May 2024

Provider Availability

Kimi K3 is available from Moonshot AI. o4-mini is available from OpenAI.

Kimi K3

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

o4-mini

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Has open weights
Higher BrowseComp score (91.2% vs 51.5%)
Higher CharXiv-R score (91.3% vs 72.0%)
Higher GPQA score (93.5% vs 81.4%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (56.0% vs 14.7%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Moonshot AIKimi K3
OpenAIo4-mini

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K3 and o4-mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K3
✓ Preferred
o4-mini
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
OpenAI
o4-mini

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K3 vs o4-mini.

Which is better, Kimi K3 or o4-mini?

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI and o4-mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Kimi K3 compare to o4-mini in benchmarks?

Kimi K3 scores MathVision: 97.8%, DeepSearchQA: 95.0%, GPQA: 93.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.3%, BrowseComp: 91.2%. o4-mini scores AIME 2024: 93.4%, AIME 2025: 92.7%, MathVista: 84.3%, MMMU: 81.6%, GPQA: 81.4%.

Is Kimi K3 cheaper than o4-mini?

o4-mini is 2.7x cheaper for input tokens. Kimi K3 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via moonshot. o4-mini costs $1.10/M input and $4.40/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K3 and o4-mini?

Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens and o4-mini supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K3 and o4-mini?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 200K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $1.10/M), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K3 and o4-mini?

Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI and o4-mini is developed by OpenAI.