Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Laguna XS 2.1 and MiMo-V2-Flash are closely matched at 24.4 and 30.7 on the LLM Stats Score. Laguna XS 2.1 is 1.2x cheaper per token.
Poolside · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Laguna XS 2.1 and MiMo-V2-Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 24.4 and 30.7.
In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2-Flash wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Laguna XS 2.1 is roughly 1.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Laguna XS 2.1 also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Laguna XS 2.1
- cost matters — it's about 1.2x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
Choose MiMo-V2-Flash
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
4 reported for Laguna XS 2.1 · 15 for MiMo-V2-Flash
Laguna XS 2.1 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 3 benchmarks (SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0).
MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Laguna XS 2.1 ($0.10/1M tokens) costs the same as MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Laguna XS 2.1 ($0.20/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, MiMo-V2-Flash is more expensive than Laguna XS 2.1.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash has 276.0B more parameters than Laguna XS 2.1, making it 836.4% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Laguna XS 2.1 accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's 256,000 tokens. Only MiMo-V2-Flash specifies output context (16,384 tokens).
License
Usage and distribution terms
Laguna XS 2.1 is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Laguna XS 2.1 was released on 2026-07-02, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.
Laguna XS 2.1 is 7 months newer than MiMo-V2-Flash.
Jul 2, 2026
2 months ago
6mo newerDec 16, 2025
9 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Laguna XS 2.1 is available from Poolside. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi.
Laguna XS 2.1
MiMo-V2-Flash
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Laguna XS 2.1 and MiMo-V2-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiMo-V2-Flash.