The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM2.5-VL-3B vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Comparing LFM2.5-VL-3B and MiMo-V2-Flash across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Liquid AI · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LFM2.5-VL-3B and MiMo-V2-Flash trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM2.5-VL-3B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose MiMo-V2-Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
256,000
Released
Aug 2026
Dec 2025
License
LFM Open License v1.0
MIT

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

LFM2.5-VL-3B and MiMo-V2-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

305.9B diff

MiMo-V2-Flash has 305.9B more parameters than LFM2.5-VL-3B, making it 9792.8% larger.

Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
3.1Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
309.0Bparameters
3.1B
LFM2.5-VL-3B
309.0B
MiMo-V2-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2-Flash specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only MiMo-V2-Flash specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

LFM2.5-VL-3B supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.

LFM2.5-VL-3B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM2.5-VL-3B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM2.5-VL-3B was released on 2026-08-12, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.

LFM2.5-VL-3B is 8 months newer than MiMo-V2-Flash.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

7mo newer
MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM2.5-VL-3B and MiMo-V2-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM2.5-VL-3B
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM2.5-VL-3B vs MiMo-V2-Flash.

Which is better, LFM2.5-VL-3B or MiMo-V2-Flash?

LFM2.5-VL-3B (Liquid AI) and MiMo-V2-Flash (Xiaomi) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does LFM2.5-VL-3B compare to MiMo-V2-Flash in benchmarks?

LFM2.5-VL-3B scores DocVQA: 91.1%, POPE: 88.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 87.9%, TextVQA: 84.3%, OCRBench: 84.2%. MiMo-V2-Flash scores AIME 2025: 94.1%, Arena-Hard v2: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 84.9%, HMMT 2025: 84.4%, GPQA: 83.7%.

What are the context window sizes for LFM2.5-VL-3B and MiMo-V2-Flash?

LFM2.5-VL-3B supports an unknown number of tokens and MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LFM2.5-VL-3B and MiMo-V2-Flash?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM2.5-VL-3B and MiMo-V2-Flash?

LFM2.5-VL-3B is developed by Liquid AI and MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.