The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM2.5-VL-3B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 3.2.

Liquid AI · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 3.2, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM2.5-VL-3B

  • you are already invested in the Liquid AI ecosystem

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.6 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

LFM2.5-VL-3B
Liquid AI
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
3.2
#312
45.6
#29
Reasoning
-2.3
#334
42.5
#45
Agents
-5.3
#184
33.1
#26
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.14 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.28 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

23 reported for LFM2.5-VL-3B · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

No common benchmarks found

LFM2.5-VL-3B and MiMo-V2.6-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

305.9B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 305.9B more parameters than LFM2.5-VL-3B, making it 9792.8% larger.

Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
3.1Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
3.1B
LFM2.5-VL-3B
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both LFM2.5-VL-3B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM2.5-VL-3B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM2.5-VL-3B was released on 2026-08-12, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 1 month newer than LFM2.5-VL-3B.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Aug 12, 2026

1 months ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM2.5-VL-3B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM2.5-VL-3B
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM2.5-VL-3B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, LFM2.5-VL-3B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 3.2. LFM2.5-VL-3B is made by Liquid AI and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LFM2.5-VL-3B compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

LFM2.5-VL-3B scores DocVQA: 91.1%, POPE: 88.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 87.9%, TextVQA: 84.3%, OCRBench: 84.2%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

What are the context window sizes for LFM2.5-VL-3B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

LFM2.5-VL-3B supports an unknown number of tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LFM2.5-VL-3B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.2 vs 45.6), licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM2.5-VL-3B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

LFM2.5-VL-3B is developed by Liquid AI and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons