The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM2.5-VL-3B vs Phi 4

LFM2.5-VL-3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Liquid AI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LFM2.5-VL-3B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Phi 4 is better at 0 benchmarks. LFM2.5-VL-3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM2.5-VL-3B

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Phi 4

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.07/M input and $0.14/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.07 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.14 / M
Context window
16,000
Released
Aug 2026
Dec 2024
License
LFM Open License v1.0
MIT

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

LFM2.5-VL-3B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Phi 4 is better at 0 benchmarks.

LFM2.5-VL-3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

11.6B diff

Phi 4 has 11.6B more parameters than LFM2.5-VL-3B, making it 370.6% larger.

Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
3.1Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4
14.7Bparameters
3.1B
LFM2.5-VL-3B
14.7B
Phi 4

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Phi 4 specifies input context (16,000 tokens). Only Phi 4 specifies output context (16,000 tokens).

Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4
Input16,000 tokens
Output16,000 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

LFM2.5-VL-3B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 does not.

LFM2.5-VL-3B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM2.5-VL-3B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while Phi 4 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Phi 4

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM2.5-VL-3B was released on 2026-08-12, while Phi 4 was released on 2024-12-12.

LFM2.5-VL-3B is 20 months newer than Phi 4.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.7yr newer
Phi 4

Dec 12, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while LFM2.5-VL-3B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without LFM2.5-VL-3B's cutoff date.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Phi 4

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM2.5-VL-3B and Phi 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM2.5-VL-3B
✓ Preferred
Phi 4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM2.5-VL-3B vs Phi 4.

Which is better, LFM2.5-VL-3B or Phi 4?

LFM2.5-VL-3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. LFM2.5-VL-3B is made by Liquid AI and Phi 4 is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does LFM2.5-VL-3B compare to Phi 4 in benchmarks?

LFM2.5-VL-3B scores DocVQA: 91.1%, POPE: 88.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 87.9%, TextVQA: 84.3%, OCRBench: 84.2%. Phi 4 scores MMLU: 84.8%, HumanEval+: 82.8%, HumanEval: 82.6%, MGSM: 80.6%, MATH: 80.4%.

What are the context window sizes for LFM2.5-VL-3B and Phi 4?

LFM2.5-VL-3B supports an unknown number of tokens and Phi 4 supports 16K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LFM2.5-VL-3B and Phi 4?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM2.5-VL-3B and Phi 4?

LFM2.5-VL-3B is developed by Liquid AI and Phi 4 is developed by Microsoft.