The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM2.5-VL-3B vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Comparing LFM2.5-VL-3B and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Liquid AI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LFM2.5-VL-3B and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM2.5-VL-3B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

LFM2.5-VL-3B
Liquid AI
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—
Released
Aug 2026
Apr 2025
License
LFM Open License v1.0
MIT

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

LFM2.5-VL-3B and Phi 4 Mini Reasoningdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

676.5M diff

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning has 0.7B more parameters than LFM2.5-VL-3B, making it 21.7% larger.

Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
3.1Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
3.8Bparameters
3.1B
LFM2.5-VL-3B
3.8B
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

LFM2.5-VL-3B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Mini Reasoning does not.

LFM2.5-VL-3B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM2.5-VL-3B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while Phi 4 Mini Reasoning uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM2.5-VL-3B was released on 2026-08-12, while Phi 4 Mini Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

LFM2.5-VL-3B is 16 months newer than Phi 4 Mini Reasoning.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.3yr newer
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while LFM2.5-VL-3B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Mini Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without LFM2.5-VL-3B's cutoff date.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

—

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Feb 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM2.5-VL-3B and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM2.5-VL-3B
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM2.5-VL-3B vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning.

Which is better, LFM2.5-VL-3B or Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

LFM2.5-VL-3B (Liquid AI) and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning (Microsoft) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does LFM2.5-VL-3B compare to Phi 4 Mini Reasoning in benchmarks?

LFM2.5-VL-3B scores DocVQA: 91.1%, POPE: 88.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 87.9%, TextVQA: 84.3%, OCRBench: 84.2%. Phi 4 Mini Reasoning scores MATH-500: 94.6%, AIME: 57.5%, GPQA: 52.0%.

What are the main differences between LFM2.5-VL-3B and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM2.5-VL-3B and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

LFM2.5-VL-3B is developed by Liquid AI and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons