The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM2.5-VL-3B vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Liquid AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LFM2.5-VL-3B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (RealWorldQA), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 7 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, MMBench-V1.1, MMMU-Pro, MMStar, MuirBench, TextVQA). Qwen2.5-Omni-7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM2.5-VL-3B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 7 of 8 shared benchmarks

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 8
7 of 8
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
Released
Aug 2026
Mar 2025
License
LFM Open License v1.0
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

LFM2.5-VL-3B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (RealWorldQA), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 7 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, MMBench-V1.1, MMMU-Pro, MMStar, MuirBench, TextVQA).

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

3.9B diff

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B has 3.9B more parameters than LFM2.5-VL-3B, making it 124.1% larger.

Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
3.1Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
7.0Bparameters
3.1B
LFM2.5-VL-3B
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both LFM2.5-VL-3B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM2.5-VL-3B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM2.5-VL-3B was released on 2026-08-12, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

LFM2.5-VL-3B is 17 months newer than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.4yr newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM2.5-VL-3B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM2.5-VL-3B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM2.5-VL-3B vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, LFM2.5-VL-3B or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. LFM2.5-VL-3B is made by Liquid AI and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does LFM2.5-VL-3B compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

LFM2.5-VL-3B scores DocVQA: 91.1%, POPE: 88.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 87.9%, TextVQA: 84.3%, OCRBench: 84.2%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the main differences between LFM2.5-VL-3B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM2.5-VL-3B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

LFM2.5-VL-3B is developed by Liquid AI and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.