The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM3-1.7B vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

LFM3-1.7B leads the LLM Stats Score 25.0 to 14.5.

Liquid AI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LFM3-1.7B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 25.0 to 14.5, ranking #191 overall.

The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM3-1.7B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 25.0 and ranks #191 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
25.0
#191
14.5
#271
20.8
#216
14.9
#265
7.4
#218
5.6
#228
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 2
1 of 2
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
LFM3-1.7B
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
7.6#285
18.3#199
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for LFM3-1.7B · 11 for Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

2 shared

LFM3-1.7B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Sun Nov 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

12.3B diff

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has 12.3B more parameters than LFM3-1.7B, making it 709.2% larger.

Liquid AI
LFM3-1.7B
1.7Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
14.0Bparameters
1.7B
LFM3-1.7B
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM3-1.7B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM3-1.7B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM3-1.7B was released on 2026-10-27, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30.

LFM3-1.7B is 18 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

LFM3-1.7B

Oct 27, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.5yr newer
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while LFM3-1.7B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning Plus's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without LFM3-1.7B's cutoff date.

LFM3-1.7B

—

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM3-1.7B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM3-1.7B
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM3-1.7B vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Which is better, LFM3-1.7B or Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

LFM3-1.7B leads the LLM Stats Score 25.0 to 14.5. LFM3-1.7B is made by Liquid AI and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LFM3-1.7B compare to Phi 4 Reasoning Plus in benchmarks?

LFM3-1.7B scores IFEval: 96.7%, Multi-IF: 89.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 73.5%, IFBench: 73.0%, BFCL-V4: 71.4%. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%.

What are the main differences between LFM3-1.7B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (25.0 vs 14.5), licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM3-1.7B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

LFM3-1.7B is developed by Liquid AI and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft.