The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nova Micro

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.2 to 2.4. Nova Micro is 1.6x cheaper per token.

InclusionAI · Amazon · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.2 to 2.4, ranking #41 overall.

On price, Nova Micro is roughly 1.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.2 and ranks #41 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Nova Micro

  • cost matters — it's about 1.6x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Nova Micro
Amazon
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.2
#41
2.4
#313
Reasoning
44.6
#33
1.7
#308
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.06 / M
$0.03 / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
$0.14 / M
Context window
262,144
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Nova Micro
Finance
36.7#5
1.5#184
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 17 for Nova Micro

No common benchmarks found

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nova Microdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nova Micro costs less

For input processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Nova Micro ($0.03/1M tokens).

For output processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Nova Micro ($0.14/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is more expensive than Nova Micro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Amazon
Nova Micro
Input tokens$0.03
Output tokens$0.14
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Nova Micro's 128,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Nova Micro is limited to 128,000 tokens.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Amazon
Nova Micro
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while Nova Micro was released on 2024-11-20.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 22 months newer than Nova Micro.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.8yr newer
Nova Micro

Nov 20, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra. Nova Micro is available from Bedrock.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M

Nova Micro

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.03/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.14/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nova Micro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
✓ Preferred
Nova Micro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nova Micro.

Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or Nova Micro?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.2 to 2.4. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI and Nova Micro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.0 Flash Fin compare to Nova Micro in benchmarks?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%. Nova Micro scores GSM8k: 92.3%, ARC-C: 90.2%, Translation Set1→en COMET22: 88.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.5%, IFEval: 87.2%.

Is Ling 3.0 Flash Fin cheaper than Nova Micro?

Nova Micro is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra. Nova Micro costs $0.03/M input and $0.14/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nova Micro?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens and Nova Micro supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nova Micro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.2 vs 2.4), context window (262K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.06 vs $0.03/M), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nova Micro?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI and Nova Micro is developed by Amazon.

Related comparisons