Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Solar Pro 4

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.2 to 35.2. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 5.8x cheaper per token.

InclusionAI · Upstage · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.2 to 35.2, ranking #41 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 5.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Solar Pro 4 also accepts a larger context window (524,288 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

overall performance matters — it scores 43.2 and ranks #41 on LLM Stats
your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
cost matters — it's about 5.8x cheaper per token
you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Solar Pro 4

you process long inputs — it offers a 524,288 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Better token value: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Core performance indexes

LLM Stats Score

43.2

#41 · 5 evals

Best

35.2

#86 · 9 evals

Reasoning

44.6

#33 · 4 evals

Best

34.8

#83 · 9 evals

Agents

29.5

#36 · 5 evals

Best

11.9

#106 · 3 evals

Cost, coverage & limits

Benchmark wins

1 of 1

Best

0 of 1

Input price

$0.06 / M

Best

$0.30 / M

Output price

$0.18 / M

Best

$1.20 / M

Context window

262,144

524,288

Best

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared

Index

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Solar Pro 4

Tool use

20.4#57 · 2 evals

11.6#111 · 2 evals

Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 9 for Solar Pro 4

1 shared

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Tau3 Banking), while Solar Pro 4 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Solar Pro 4 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens) is 6.7x cheaper than Solar Pro 4 ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Solar Pro 4 is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Input tokens$0.06

Output tokens$0.18

Best providerDeepinfra

Solar Pro 4

Input tokens$0.30

Output tokens$1.20

Best providerUnknown Organization

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Solar Pro 4 accepts 524,288 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's 262,144 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Solar Pro 4 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Input262,144 tokens

Output262,144 tokens

Solar Pro 4

Input524,288 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while Solar Pro 4 was released on 2026-08-06.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 1 month newer than Solar Pro 4.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

1 weeks ago

4w newer

Solar Pro 4

Aug 6, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra. Solar Pro 4 is available from Upstage.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M

Solar Pro 4

Unknown Organization

Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Solar Pro 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

✓ Preferred

Solar Pro 4

Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Solar Pro 4.

Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or Solar Pro 4?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.2 to 35.2. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI and Solar Pro 4 is made by Upstage. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.0 Flash Fin compare to Solar Pro 4 in benchmarks?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%. Solar Pro 4 scores AIME 2026: 95.3%, GPQA: 89.0%, LiveCodeBench: 87.8%, MMLU-Pro: 86.3%, AA-LCR: 71.0%.

Is Ling 3.0 Flash Fin cheaper than Solar Pro 4?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra. Solar Pro 4 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via upstage.

What are the context window sizes for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Solar Pro 4?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens and Solar Pro 4 supports 524K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Solar Pro 4?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.2 vs 35.2), context window (262K vs 524K), input pricing ($0.06 vs $0.30/M), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Solar Pro 4?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI and Solar Pro 4 is developed by Upstage.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Solar Pro 4