The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 0.4.

InclusionAI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 0.4, ranking #15 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.0
#15
0.4
#340
Reasoning
47.5
#26
0.1
#333
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Ling 3.1 Flash · 11 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Ling 3.1 Flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

490.0B diff

Ling 3.1 Flash has 490.0B more parameters than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct, making it 700.0% larger.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
560.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
70.0Bparameters
560.0B
Ling 3.1 Flash
70.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 24 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

2.0yr newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

Ling 3.1 Flash

—

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.1 Flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.1 Flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 0.4. Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.1 Flash compare to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct in benchmarks?

Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.1 Flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.0 vs 0.4), licensing (Unknown vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.1 Flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons