Model Comparison

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507Which is better in 2026?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is 2.8x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 — which is better?

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct (by Meta) and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro). Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is roughly 2.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Llama 3.1 405B Instruct if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.89/M input and $0.89/M output

Choose Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 2.8x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 costs less

For input processing, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct ($0.89/1M tokens) is 5.9x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct ($0.89/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ($0.80/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Input tokens$0.89
Output tokens$0.89
Best providerLambda
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.80
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

170.0B diff

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has 170.0B more parameters than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507, making it 72.3% larger.

Meta
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
405.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
235.0Bparameters
405.0B
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
235.0B
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Llama 3.1 405B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Meta
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 was released on 2025-07-22.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is 12 months newer than Llama 3.1 405B Instruct.

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

1.9 years ago

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Jul 22, 2025

10 months ago

12mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available from Lambda, DeepInfra, Fireworks, Bedrock, Together, Hyperbolic, Google, Replicate. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is available from Fireworks, Novita.

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.79/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.79/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $3.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.50/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $16.00/1M
replicate logo
Replicate
Input Price:Input: $9.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $9.50/1M

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (77.5% vs 50.7%)
Higher IFEval score (88.7% vs 88.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (83.0% vs 73.3%)

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is made by Meta and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Llama 3.1 405B Instruct compare to Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 in benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct scores ARC-C: 96.9%, GSM8k: 96.8%, API-Bank: 92.0%, Multilingual MGSM (CoT): 91.6%, HumanEval: 89.0%. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 scores ZebraLogic: 95.0%, MMLU-Redux: 93.1%, IFEval: 88.7%, MultiPL-E: 87.9%, Creative Writing v3: 87.5%.

Is Llama 3.1 405B Instruct cheaper than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is 5.9x cheaper for input tokens. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct costs $0.89/M input and $0.89/M output via lambda. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 costs $0.15/M input and $0.80/M output via fireworks.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 262K), input pricing ($0.89 vs $0.15/M), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is developed by Meta and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.