The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Mistral Large 2

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 2 are closely matched at 7.6 and 7.4 on the LLM Stats Score. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is 15.0x cheaper per token.

Meta · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 2 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 7.6 and 7.4.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Mistral Large 2 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is roughly 15.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 15.0x cheaper per token

Choose Mistral Large 2

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
7.6
#286
7.4
#288
6.3
#288
7.3
#281
3.6
#215
13.0
#138
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$0.20 / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
$0.20 / M
$6.00 / M
Context window
128,000
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Mistral Large 2
11.4#241
11.3#244
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct · 5 for Mistral Large 2

2 shared

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Mistral Large 2 is better at 2 benchmarks (HumanEval, MMLU).

Mistral Large 2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens) is 10.0x cheaper than Mistral Large 2 ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens) is 30.0x cheaper than Mistral Large 2 ($6.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Mistral Large 2 is more expensive than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Sep 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerLambda
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

53.0B diff

Mistral Large 2 has 53.0B more parameters than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, making it 75.7% larger.

Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
70.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2
123.0Bparameters
70.0B
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
123.0B
Mistral Large 2

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Wed Sep 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Mistral Large 2 uses Mistral Research License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Mistral Large 2

Mistral Research License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23, while Mistral Large 2 was released on 2024-07-24.

Mistral Large 2 is 0 month newer than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

2.1 years ago

Mistral Large 2

Jul 24, 2024

2.1 years ago

1d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available from Lambda, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Groq, Cerebras, Together, Fireworks, Bedrock, Sambanova. Mistral Large 2 is available from Google, Mistral AI.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.35/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.59/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.78/1M
cerebras logo
Cerebras
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Mistral Large 2

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Mistral Large 2
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Mistral Large 2.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Mistral Large 2?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 2 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 7.6 and 7.4. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is made by Meta and Mistral Large 2 is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 3.1 70B Instruct compare to Mistral Large 2 in benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct scores GSM-8K (CoT): 95.1%, ARC-C: 94.8%, API-Bank: 90.0%, IFEval: 87.5%, Multilingual MGSM (CoT): 86.9%. Mistral Large 2 scores GSM8k: 93.0%, HumanEval: 92.0%, MT-Bench: 86.3%, MMLU: 84.0%, MMLU French: 82.8%.

Is Llama 3.1 70B Instruct cheaper than Mistral Large 2?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is 10.0x cheaper for input tokens. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs $0.20/M input and $0.20/M output via lambda. Mistral Large 2 costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 2?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Mistral Large 2 supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 2?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (7.6 vs 7.4), input pricing ($0.20 vs $2.00/M), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Mistral Research License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Mistral Large 2?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is developed by Meta and Mistral Large 2 is developed by Mistral AI.