Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 20.1 to 7.6. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is 1.7x cheaper per token.
Meta · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 20.1 to 7.6, ranking #197 overall.
In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is roughly 1.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
- cost matters — it's about 1.7x cheaper per token
Choose Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
- overall performance matters — it scores 20.1 and ranks #197 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
18 reported for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct · 24 for Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro).
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens) is 2.2x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct ($0.09/1M tokens).
For output processing, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens) is 5.5x cheaper than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct ($1.10/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is more expensive than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct has 10.0B more parameters than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, making it 14.3% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Llama 3.1 70B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is limited to 128,000 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Llama 3.1 Community License
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct was released on 2025-09-10.
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is 14 months newer than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct.
Jul 23, 2024
2.1 years ago
Sep 10, 2025
1.0 years ago
1.1yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available from Lambda, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Groq, Cerebras, Together, Fireworks, Bedrock, Sambanova. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Novita.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct.