The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct are closely matched at 4.8 and 2.5 on the LLM Stats Score.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 4.8 and 2.5.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $0.30/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
4.8
#299
2.5
#312
5.3
#294
2.6
#305
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
8.8#257
8.1#260
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 · 14 for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

4 shared

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MBPP), while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MT-Bench).

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

390.0M diff

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 has 0.4B more parameters than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct, making it 5.1% larger.

NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
8.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
7.6Bparameters
8.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
7.6B
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen2.5 7B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 was released on 2025-03-18, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is 6 months newer than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Mar 18, 2025

1.5 years ago

6mo newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Dec 2023

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 4.8 and 2.5. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is made by NVIDIA and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 compare to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 scores MATH-500: 95.4%, MBPP: 84.6%, MT-Bench: 81.0%, IFEval: 79.3%, BFCL v2: 63.6%. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.6%, MT-Bench: 87.5%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MBPP: 79.2%, MATH: 75.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (4.8 vs 2.5), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.