The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Qwen3 32B

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3 32B are closely matched at 19.1 and 18.4 on the LLM Stats Score.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3 32B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 19.1 and 18.4.

The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

  • you are already invested in the NVIDIA ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 32B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
19.1
#214
18.4
#220
18.8
#213
18.6
#214
12.4
#153
8.9
#186
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 2
1 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.08 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.28 / M
Context window
—
40,960

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Qwen3 32B
15.6#216
21.2#150
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 · 9 for Qwen3 32B

2 shared

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (LiveCodeBench), while Qwen3 32B is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Wed Sep 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

220.2B diff

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has 220.2B more parameters than Qwen3 32B, making it 671.3% larger.

NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
253.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
32.8Bparameters
253.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
32.8B
Qwen3 32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 32B specifies input context (40,960 tokens). Only Qwen3 32B specifies output context (40,960 tokens).

NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input40,960 tokens
Output40,960 tokens
Wed Sep 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Qwen3 32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Qwen3 32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 was released on 2025-04-07, while Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 32B is 1 month newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Apr 7, 2025

1.5 years ago

Qwen3 32B

Apr 29, 2025

1.4 years ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while Qwen3 32B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 32B's cutoff date.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Dec 2023

Qwen3 32B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3 32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Qwen3 32B.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 or Qwen3 32B?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3 32B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 19.1 and 18.4. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3 32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 compare to Qwen3 32B in benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 scores MATH-500: 97.0%, IFEval: 89.5%, GPQA: 76.0%, BFCL v2: 74.1%, AIME 2025: 72.5%. Qwen3 32B scores Arena Hard: 93.8%, AIME 2024: 81.4%, LiveBench: 74.9%, MultiLF: 73.0%, AIME 2025: 72.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3 32B?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 32B supports 41K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3 32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (19.1 vs 18.4), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3 32B?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3 32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.