The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking are closely matched at 18.7 and 23.4 on the LLM Stats Score.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 18.7 and 23.4.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

  • you are already invested in the NVIDIA ecosystem

Choose Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
18.7
#232
23.4
#196
18.4
#229
24.1
#180
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.50 / M
Context window
—
65,536

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
15.5#227
26.4#110
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 · 23 for Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

3 shared

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA).

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Oct 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

173.0B diff

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has 173.0B more parameters than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking, making it 216.3% larger.

NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
253.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
80.0Bparameters
253.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
80.0B
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking specifies input context (65,536 tokens). Only Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input65,536 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Mon Oct 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 was released on 2025-04-07, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking was released on 2025-09-10.

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 5 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Apr 7, 2025

1.6 years ago

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Sep 10, 2025

1.1 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's cutoff date.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Dec 2023

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 18.7 and 23.4. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 compare to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking in benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 scores MATH-500: 97.0%, IFEval: 89.5%, GPQA: 76.0%, BFCL v2: 74.1%, AIME 2025: 72.5%. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking scores MMLU-Redux: 92.5%, IFEval: 88.9%, AIME 2025: 87.8%, WritingBench: 84.6%, MMLU-Pro: 82.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking supports 66K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (18.7 vs 23.4), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.