Model Comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Llama 3.2 3B InstructWhich is better in 2026?
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is 4.0x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct — which is better?
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct (by Meta) and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct outperforms in 3 benchmarks (MATH, MGSM, MMLU), while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
On price, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is roughly 4.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Choose Llama 3.2 11B Instruct if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks
Choose Llama 3.2 3B Instruct if…
- cost matters — it's about 4.0x cheaper per token
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct outperforms in 3 benchmarks (MATH, MGSM, MMLU), while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct ($0.05/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct ($0.01/1M tokens).
For output processing, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct ($0.05/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct ($0.02/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is more expensive than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has 7.4B more parameters than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct, making it 230.2% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.2 3B Instruct does not.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Llama 3.2 Community License.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Llama 3.2 Community License
Open weights
Llama 3.2 Community License
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Both models were released on 2024-09-25.
They likely represent similar generations of model development.
Sep 25, 2024
1.9 years ago
Sep 25, 2024
1.9 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Llama 3.2 11B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Llama 3.2 3B Instruct's cutoff date.
Dec 2023
—
Provider Availability
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Sambanova, Bedrock, Groq, Together, Fireworks. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.