Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads the LLM Stats Score 13.1 to -1.3.
Meta · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 13.1 to -1.3, ranking #246 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
- you want predictable pricing at $0.05/M input and $0.05/M output
Choose Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
- overall performance matters — it scores 13.1 and ranks #246 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Llama 3.2 11B Instruct · 7 for Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has 39.3B more parameters than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct, making it 370.8% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 does not.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
License
Usage and distribution terms
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.2 Community License, while Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 uses Llama 3.1 Community License.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Llama 3.2 Community License
Open weights
Llama 3.1 Community License
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25, while Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 was released on 2025-03-18.
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is 6 months newer than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.
Sep 25, 2024
2.0 years ago
Mar 18, 2025
1.5 years ago
5mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Both models have the same knowledge cutoff date of 2023-12-31.
They should have similar awareness of historical events and information up to this date.
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.
Related comparisons
More Llama 3.2 11B Instruct comparisons
More Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 comparisons
- Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Atria Dawn Preview
- Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Kimi K2.8 Preview
- Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash