The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct are closely matched at -1.3 and -3.4 on the LLM Stats Score.

Meta · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -1.3 and -3.4.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024

Choose Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-1.3
#333
-3.4
#343
-0.8
#324
-4.8
#343
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 4
0 of 4
Input price
$0.05 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.05 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
-0.3#182
-3.6#194
2.4#147
-1.1#156
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Llama 3.2 11B Instruct · 9 for Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

4 shared

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AI2D, ChartQA, MathVista, MMMU), while Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

6.4B diff

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has 6.4B more parameters than Phi-3.5-vision-instruct, making it 152.4% larger.

Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
10.6Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
4.2Bparameters
10.6B
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
4.2B
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.2 Community License, while Phi-3.5-vision-instruct uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.2 Community License

Open weights

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25, while Phi-3.5-vision-instruct was released on 2024-08-23.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is 1 month newer than Phi-3.5-vision-instruct.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

2.0 years ago

1mo newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Phi-3.5-vision-instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.2 11B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Phi-3.5-vision-instruct's cutoff date.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Dec 2023

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct.

Which is better, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct or Phi-3.5-vision-instruct?

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -1.3 and -3.4. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is made by Meta and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 3.2 11B Instruct compare to Phi-3.5-vision-instruct in benchmarks?

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct scores AI2D: 91.1%, DocVQA: 88.4%, ChartQA: 83.4%, VQAv2 (test): 75.2%, MMLU: 73.0%. Phi-3.5-vision-instruct scores ScienceQA: 91.3%, POPE: 86.1%, MMBench: 81.9%, ChartQA: 81.8%, AI2D: 78.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct?

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-1.3 vs -3.4), licensing (Llama 3.2 Community License vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct?

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is developed by Meta and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is developed by Microsoft.