The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs MiniCPM-SALA

MiniCPM-SALA leads the LLM Stats Score 14.4 to -6.1.

Meta · OpenBMB · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniCPM-SALA leads the overall LLM Stats Score 14.4 to -6.1, ranking #244 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose MiniCPM-SALA

  • overall performance matters — it scores 14.4 and ranks #244 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-6.1
#368
14.4
#244
-6.7
#362
15.7
#229
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.01 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.02 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
MiniCPM-SALA
-3.7#315
14.2#222
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct · 24 for MiniCPM-SALA

1 shared

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while MiniCPM-SALA is better at 0 benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Oct 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

6.3B diff

MiniCPM-SALA has 6.3B more parameters than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct, making it 195.2% larger.

Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
3.2Bparameters
OpenBMB
MiniCPM-SALA
9.5Bparameters
3.2B
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
9.5B
MiniCPM-SALA

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenBMB
MiniCPM-SALA
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.2 Community License, while MiniCPM-SALA uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Llama 3.2 Community License

Open weights

MiniCPM-SALA

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25, while MiniCPM-SALA was released on 2026-02-11.

MiniCPM-SALA is 17 months newer than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

2.0 years ago

MiniCPM-SALA

Feb 11, 2026

7 months ago

1.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and MiniCPM-SALA side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
✓ Preferred
MiniCPM-SALA
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs MiniCPM-SALA.

Which is better, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or MiniCPM-SALA?

MiniCPM-SALA leads the LLM Stats Score 14.4 to -6.1. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is made by Meta and MiniCPM-SALA is made by OpenBMB. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 3.2 3B Instruct compare to MiniCPM-SALA in benchmarks?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct scores NIH/Multi-needle: 84.7%, ARC-C: 78.6%, GSM8k: 77.7%, IFEval: 77.4%, HellaSwag: 69.8%. MiniCPM-SALA scores HumanEval: 95.1%, RULER 64k: 92.7%, RULER 128k: 89.4%, MBPP: 89.1%, RULER 512K: 87.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and MiniCPM-SALA?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct supports 128K tokens and MiniCPM-SALA supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and MiniCPM-SALA?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-6.1 vs 14.4), licensing (Llama 3.2 Community License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and MiniCPM-SALA?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is developed by Meta and MiniCPM-SALA is developed by OpenBMB.