The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 13.1.

NVIDIA · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 13.1, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

  • you are already invested in the NVIDIA ecosystem

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
13.1
#249
45.7
#29
Reasoning
13.2
#241
43.2
#42
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

No common benchmarks found

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

259.1B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 259.1B more parameters than Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1, making it 519.2% larger.

NVIDIA
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
49.9Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
49.9B
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 was released on 2025-03-18, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 18 months newer than Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Mar 18, 2025

1.5 years ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date.

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Dec 2023

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 13.1. Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is made by NVIDIA and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 scores MATH-500: 96.6%, MT-Bench: 91.7%, MBPP: 91.3%, Arena Hard: 88.3%, BFCL v2: 73.7%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

What are the main differences between Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.1 vs 45.7), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is developed by NVIDIA and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons