The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct are closely matched at 7.8 and 3.8 on the LLM Stats Score.

Meta · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 7.8 and 3.8.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 4 Scout

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 5 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
7.8
#299
3.8
#322
6.6
#302
3.3
#317
0.3
#255
3.9
#228
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 5
3 of 5
Input price
$0.08 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Context window
10,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Llama 4 Scout
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
12.8#238
10.6#255
10.2#146
5.0#174
10.2#130
5.7#158
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Llama 4 Scout · 16 for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

5 shared

Llama 4 Scout outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (MATH, MBPP, MMLU).

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

94.3B diff

Llama 4 Scout has 94.3B more parameters than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct, making it 641.5% larger.

Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
14.7Bparameters
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout
14.7B
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Scout specifies input context (10,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Scout specifies output context (10,000,000 tokens).

Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not.

Llama 4 Scout can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 4 Scout is licensed under Llama 4 Community License Agreement, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Llama 4 Scout is 7 months newer than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.5 years ago

6mo newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 4 Scout
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 7.8 and 3.8. Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 4 Scout compare to Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in benchmarks?

Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores GSM8k: 94.8%, HumanEval: 83.5%, MBPP: 82.0%, MATH: 80.0%, MMLU-Redux: 80.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (7.8 vs 3.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Llama 4 Community License Agreement vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 4 Scout and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.