Model Comparison

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 32B

Qwen3 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 4 Scout is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Llama 4 Scout outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 32B is better at 1 benchmark (LiveCodeBench).

Qwen3 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Scout costs less

For input processing, Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than Qwen3 32B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens) costs the same as Qwen3 32B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 32B is more expensive than Llama 4 Scout.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sat May 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Llama 4 Scout

Input tokens$0.08

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerDeepinfra

Qwen3 32B

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

76.2B diff

Llama 4 Scout has 76.2B more parameters than Qwen3 32B, making it 232.3% larger.

Llama 4 Scout

109.0Bparameters

Qwen3 32B

32.8Bparameters

109.0B

Llama 4 Scout

32.8B

Qwen3 32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 32B's 128,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout can generate longer responses up to 10,000,000 tokens, while Qwen3 32B is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Llama 4 Scout

Input10,000,000 tokens

Output10,000,000 tokens

Qwen3 32B

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Sat May 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 32B does not.

Llama 4 Scout can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama 4 Scout

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 32B

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 4 Scout is licensed under Llama 4 Community License Agreement, while Qwen3 32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Qwen3 32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05, while Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 32B is 1 month newer than Llama 4 Scout.

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

Qwen3 32B

Apr 29, 2025

1.0 years ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together. Qwen3 32B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Sambanova.

Llama 4 Scout

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Lambda

Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Groq

Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.34/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Together

Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.59/1M

Qwen3 32B

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M

Sambanova

Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Llama 4 Scout

View details

Qwen3 32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher LiveCodeBench score (65.7% vs 32.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Llama 4 Scout	Qwen3 32B

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 32B.

Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta and Qwen3 32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Llama 4 Scout compare to Qwen3 32B in benchmarks?

Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%. Qwen3 32B scores Arena Hard: 93.8%, AIME 2024: 81.4%, LiveBench: 74.9%, MultiLF: 73.0%, AIME 2025: 72.9%.

Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than Qwen3 32B?

Llama 4 Scout is 1.3x cheaper for input tokens. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3 32B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 32B?

Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens and Qwen3 32B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 32B?

Key differences include context window (10.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($0.08 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Llama 4 Community License Agreement vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 32B?

Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta and Qwen3 32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.