LongCat-Flash-Chat vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 19.5.
Meituan · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 19.5, ranking #142 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose LongCat-Flash-Chat
- you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- overall performance matters — it scores 29.9 and ranks #142 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
16 reported for LongCat-Flash-Chat · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
LongCat-Flash-Chat outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
LongCat-Flash-Chat has 486.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB), making it 656.8% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only LongCat-Flash-Chat specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only LongCat-Flash-Chat specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports multimodal inputs, whereas LongCat-Flash-Chat does not.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
LongCat-Flash-Chat
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
License
Usage and distribution terms
LongCat-Flash-Chat is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
LongCat-Flash-Chat was released on 2025-08-29, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 14 months newer than LongCat-Flash-Chat.
Aug 29, 2025
1.1 years ago
Oct 15, 2026
4 days ago
1.1yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while LongCat-Flash-Chat's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)'s training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without LongCat-Flash-Chat's cutoff date.
—
May 2026
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against LongCat-Flash-Chat and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about LongCat-Flash-Chat vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).
Related comparisons
More LongCat-Flash-Chat comparisons
More Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Muse Spark Open
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Muse Wonder