The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Magistral Medium vs QwQ-32B

QwQ-32B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mistral AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Magistral Medium outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while QwQ-32B is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, LiveCodeBench). QwQ-32B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Magistral Medium

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
Released
Jun 2025
Mar 2025
License
Apache 2.0
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Magistral Medium outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while QwQ-32B is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, LiveCodeBench).

QwQ-32B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

8.5B diff

QwQ-32B has 8.5B more parameters than Magistral Medium, making it 35.4% larger.

Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
24.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
32.5Bparameters
24.0B
Magistral Medium
32.5B
QwQ-32B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.

Magistral Medium can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Magistral Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Magistral Medium

Apache 2.0

Open weights

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Magistral Medium was released on 2025-06-10, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

Magistral Medium is 3 months newer than QwQ-32B.

Magistral Medium

Jun 10, 2025

1.2 years ago

3mo newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Magistral Medium has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-06-01, while QwQ-32B has a cutoff of 2024-11-28.

Magistral Medium has more recent training data (up to 2025-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to QwQ-32B (2024-11-28).

Magistral Medium

Jun 2025

7 mo newer
QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Magistral Medium and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Magistral Medium
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Magistral Medium vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, Magistral Medium or QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Magistral Medium is made by Mistral AI and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Magistral Medium compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

Magistral Medium scores AIME 2024: 73.6%, GPQA: 70.8%, AIME 2025: 64.9%, LiveCodeBench: 50.3%, Aider-Polyglot: 47.1%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the main differences between Magistral Medium and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Magistral Medium and QwQ-32B?

Magistral Medium is developed by Mistral AI and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.