Model Comparison

MAI-Thinking-1 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3BWhich is better in 2026?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Verdict: MAI-Thinking-1 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B — which is better?

MAI-Thinking-1 (by Microsoft) and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

MAI-Thinking-1 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (LiveCodeBench v6, LongBench v2, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is better at 4 benchmarks (IFBench, MedXpertQA, MMLU-Pro, Multi-Challenge). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Choose MAI-Thinking-1 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2026

Choose Qwen3.5-35B-A3B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 5 of 9 shared benchmarks
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

9 benchmarks

MAI-Thinking-1 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (LiveCodeBench v6, LongBench v2, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is better at 4 benchmarks (IFBench, MedXpertQA, MMLU-Pro, Multi-Challenge).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

965.0B diff

MAI-Thinking-1 has 965.0B more parameters than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, making it 2757.1% larger.

Microsoft
MAI-Thinking-1
1.0Tparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
35.0Bparameters
1000.0B
MAI-Thinking-1
35.0B
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B specifies output context (65,000 tokens).

Microsoft
MAI-Thinking-1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Input262,144 tokens
Output65,000 tokens
Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B supports multimodal inputs, whereas MAI-Thinking-1 does not.

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MAI-Thinking-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MAI-Thinking-1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-35B-A3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MAI-Thinking-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MAI-Thinking-1 was released on 2026-06-02, while Qwen3.5-35B-A3B was released on 2026-02-24.

MAI-Thinking-1 is 3 months newer than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.

MAI-Thinking-1

Jun 2, 2026

1 months ago

3mo newer
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Feb 24, 2026

5 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher LiveCodeBench v6 score (87.7% vs 74.6%)
Higher LongBench v2 score (61.0% vs 59.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (73.5% vs 69.2%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (46.0% vs 40.5%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights
Higher IFBench score (70.2% vs 69.0%)
Higher MedXpertQA score (61.4% vs 43.0%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (85.3% vs 85.0%)
Higher Multi-Challenge score (60.0% vs 53.0%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MAI-Thinking-1 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MAI-Thinking-1
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Microsoft
MAI-Thinking-1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

FAQ

Common questions about MAI-Thinking-1 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.

Which is better, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. MAI-Thinking-1 is made by Microsoft and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does MAI-Thinking-1 compare to Qwen3.5-35B-A3B in benchmarks?

MAI-Thinking-1 scores LongFact: 98.0%, AIME 2025: 97.0%, AIME 2026: 94.5%, GraphWalks: 90.0%, AIR-Bench: 88.0%. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B scores CountBench: 97.8%, VLMsAreBlind: 97.0%, MMLU-Redux: 93.3%, V*: 92.7%, AI2D: 92.6%.

What are the context window sizes for MAI-Thinking-1 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

MAI-Thinking-1 supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MAI-Thinking-1 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MAI-Thinking-1 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

MAI-Thinking-1 is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.