The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MedGemma 4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B

Comparing MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen3.8-27B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen3.8-27B trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MedGemma 4B IT

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.8-27B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MedGemma 4B IT
Google
Qwen3.8-27B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—
Released
May 2025
Aug 2026
License
Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen3.8-27Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

23.5B diff

Qwen3.8-27B has 23.5B more parameters than MedGemma 4B IT, making it 546.1% larger.

Google
MedGemma 4B IT
4.3Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
27.8Bparameters
4.3B
MedGemma 4B IT
27.8B
Qwen3.8-27B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen3.8-27B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MedGemma 4B IT

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MedGemma 4B IT is licensed under Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use, while Qwen3.8-27B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MedGemma 4B IT

Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use

Open weights

Qwen3.8-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MedGemma 4B IT was released on 2025-05-20, while Qwen3.8-27B was released on 2026-08-14.

Qwen3.8-27B is 15 months newer than MedGemma 4B IT.

MedGemma 4B IT

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Qwen3.8-27B

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen3.8-27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MedGemma 4B IT
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MedGemma 4B IT vs Qwen3.8-27B.

Which is better, MedGemma 4B IT or Qwen3.8-27B?

MedGemma 4B IT (Google) and Qwen3.8-27B (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does MedGemma 4B IT compare to Qwen3.8-27B in benchmarks?

MedGemma 4B IT scores MIMIC CXR: 88.9%, DermMCQA: 71.8%, PathMCQA: 69.8%, SlakeVQA: 62.3%, VQA-Rad: 49.9%. Qwen3.8-27B scores MathVision: 94.6%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 90.3%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, GPQA: 89.2%.

What are the main differences between MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen3.8-27B?

Key differences include licensing (Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen3.8-27B?

MedGemma 4B IT is developed by Google and Qwen3.8-27B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons