The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM2.5-VL-3B vs MedGemma 4B IT

Comparing LFM2.5-VL-3B and MedGemma 4B IT across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Liquid AI · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LFM2.5-VL-3B and MedGemma 4B IT trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM2.5-VL-3B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose MedGemma 4B IT

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

LFM2.5-VL-3B
Liquid AI
MedGemma 4B IT
Google
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—
Released
Aug 2026
May 2025
License
LFM Open License v1.0
Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

LFM2.5-VL-3B and MedGemma 4B ITdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.2B diff

MedGemma 4B IT has 1.2B more parameters than LFM2.5-VL-3B, making it 37.7% larger.

Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
3.1Bparameters
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
4.3Bparameters
3.1B
LFM2.5-VL-3B
4.3B
MedGemma 4B IT

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both LFM2.5-VL-3B and MedGemma 4B IT support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MedGemma 4B IT

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM2.5-VL-3B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while MedGemma 4B IT uses Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

MedGemma 4B IT

Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM2.5-VL-3B was released on 2026-08-12, while MedGemma 4B IT was released on 2025-05-20.

LFM2.5-VL-3B is 15 months newer than MedGemma 4B IT.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.2yr newer
MedGemma 4B IT

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM2.5-VL-3B and MedGemma 4B IT side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM2.5-VL-3B
✓ Preferred
MedGemma 4B IT
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM2.5-VL-3B vs MedGemma 4B IT.

Which is better, LFM2.5-VL-3B or MedGemma 4B IT?

LFM2.5-VL-3B (Liquid AI) and MedGemma 4B IT (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does LFM2.5-VL-3B compare to MedGemma 4B IT in benchmarks?

LFM2.5-VL-3B scores DocVQA: 91.1%, POPE: 88.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 87.9%, TextVQA: 84.3%, OCRBench: 84.2%. MedGemma 4B IT scores MIMIC CXR: 88.9%, DermMCQA: 71.8%, PathMCQA: 69.8%, SlakeVQA: 62.3%, VQA-Rad: 49.9%.

What are the main differences between LFM2.5-VL-3B and MedGemma 4B IT?

Key differences include licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM2.5-VL-3B and MedGemma 4B IT?

LFM2.5-VL-3B is developed by Liquid AI and MedGemma 4B IT is developed by Google.

Related comparisons