The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Mercury 3 vs Seed 2.0 Lite

Mercury 3 and Seed 2.0 Lite are closely matched at 36.1 and 31.5 on the LLM Stats Score.

Inception · ByteDance · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Mercury 3 and Seed 2.0 Lite are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 36.1 and 31.5.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Mercury 3 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Mercury 3

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Seed 2.0 Lite

  • you are already invested in the ByteDance ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
36.1
#98
31.5
#132
34.8
#103
31.1
#131
21.5
#105
17.9
#134
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.35 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Mercury 3 · 5 for Seed 2.0 Lite

1 shared

Mercury 3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Seed 2.0 Lite is better at 0 benchmarks.

Mercury 3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Oct 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mercury 3 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Mercury 3 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Inception
Mercury 3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
ByteDance
Seed 2.0 Lite
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Oct 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Seed 2.0 Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mercury 3 does not.

Seed 2.0 Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Mercury 3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Seed 2.0 Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Mercury 3

Proprietary

Closed source

Seed 2.0 Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Mercury 3 was released on 2026-10-19, while Seed 2.0 Lite was released on 2026-02-14.

Mercury 3 is 8 months newer than Seed 2.0 Lite.

Mercury 3

Oct 19, 2026

5 days ago

8mo newer
Seed 2.0 Lite

Feb 14, 2026

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Seed 2.0 Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-01-01, while Mercury 3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Seed 2.0 Lite's training data extends to 2024-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mercury 3's cutoff date.

Mercury 3

—

Seed 2.0 Lite

Jan 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Mercury 3 and Seed 2.0 Lite side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Mercury 3
✓ Preferred
Seed 2.0 Lite
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Mercury 3 vs Seed 2.0 Lite.

Which is better, Mercury 3 or Seed 2.0 Lite?

Mercury 3 and Seed 2.0 Lite are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 36.1 and 31.5. Mercury 3 is made by Inception and Seed 2.0 Lite is made by ByteDance. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Mercury 3 compare to Seed 2.0 Lite in benchmarks?

Mercury 3 scores GPQA: 89.2%, AA-LCR: 77.7%, IFBench: 76.8%, MRCR v2: 75.5%, DeepSearchQA: 71.3%. Seed 2.0 Lite scores AIME 2025: 93.0%, AIME 2026: 88.3%, GPQA: 85.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 81.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Mercury 3 and Seed 2.0 Lite?

Mercury 3 supports 1.0M tokens and Seed 2.0 Lite supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Mercury 3 and Seed 2.0 Lite?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (36.1 vs 31.5), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Mercury 3 and Seed 2.0 Lite?

Mercury 3 is developed by Inception and Seed 2.0 Lite is developed by ByteDance.