Model Comparison

MiMo-V2-Omni vs MiMo-V2-ProWhich is better in 2026?

MiMo-V2-Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Omni is 1.9x cheaper per token.

Verdict: MiMo-V2-Omni vs MiMo-V2-Pro — which is better?

MiMo-V2-Omni (by Xiaomi) and MiMo-V2-Pro (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

MiMo-V2-Omni outperforms in 1 benchmarks (PinchBench), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 3 benchmarks (Claw-Eval, GDPval-AA, SWE-Bench Verified). MiMo-V2-Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

On price, MiMo-V2-Omni is roughly 1.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiMo-V2-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose MiMo-V2-Omni if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.9x cheaper per token

Choose MiMo-V2-Pro if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

MiMo-V2-Omni outperforms in 1 benchmarks (PinchBench), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 3 benchmarks (Claw-Eval, GDPval-AA, SWE-Bench Verified).

MiMo-V2-Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Omni costs less

For input processing, MiMo-V2-Omni ($0.40/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro ($1.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, MiMo-V2-Omni ($2.00/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro ($3.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiMo-V2-Pro is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$2.00
Best providerXiaomi
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2-Pro accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Omni's 262,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 16,384 tokens.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni
Input262,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

MiMo-V2-Omni supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Pro does not.

MiMo-V2-Omni can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2-Omni

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

MiMo-V2-Omni

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2026-03-18.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

MiMo-V2-Omni

Mar 18, 2026

4 months ago

MiMo-V2-Pro

Mar 18, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiMo-V2-Omni is available from Xiaomi. MiMo-V2-Pro is available from Xiaomi.

MiMo-V2-Omni

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M

MiMo-V2-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Xiaomi
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher PinchBench score (81.2% vs 81.0%)
Xiaomi
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Higher Claw-Eval score (61.5% vs 54.8%)
Higher GDPval-AA score (47.5% vs 47.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (78.0% vs 74.8%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2-Omni and MiMo-V2-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2-Omni
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2-Pro
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2-Omni vs MiMo-V2-Pro.

Which is better, MiMo-V2-Omni or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Omni is made by Xiaomi and MiMo-V2-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does MiMo-V2-Omni compare to MiMo-V2-Pro in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores PinchBench: 81.2%, SWE-Bench Verified: 74.8%, Claw-Eval: 54.8%, MM-BrowserComp: 52.0%, OmniGAIA: 49.8%. MiMo-V2-Pro scores Tau2 Telecom: 96.8%, DeepSearchQA: 86.7%, PinchBench: 81.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 78.0%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 71.7%.

Is MiMo-V2-Omni cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Omni is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. MiMo-V2-Omni costs $0.40/M input and $2.00/M output via xiaomi. MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1.00/M input and $3.00/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2-Omni and MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Omni supports 262K tokens and MiMo-V2-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2-Omni and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Key differences include context window (262K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.40 vs $1.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons