The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 37.9 to 27.4.

Xiaomi · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 37.9 to 27.4, ranking #79 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2-Omni

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.40/M input and $2.00/M output

Choose Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 37.9 and ranks #79 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2-Omni
Xiaomi
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
27.4
#158
37.9
#79
Reasoning
26.6
#160
32.3
#116
Agents
9.0
#144
21.1
#73
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Output price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Context window
262,000
—

Individual benchmarks

5 reported for MiMo-V2-Omni · 5 for Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

1 shared

MiMo-V2-Omni outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is better at 1 benchmark (OmniGAIA).

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2-Omni specifies input context (262,000 tokens). Only MiMo-V2-Omni specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni
Input262,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2-Omni

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

MiMo-V2-Omni

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2-Omni was released on 2026-03-18, while Qwen3.8 Omni Flash was released on 2026-09-18.

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 6 months newer than MiMo-V2-Omni.

MiMo-V2-Omni

Mar 18, 2026

7 months ago

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Sep 18, 2026

4 weeks ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2-Omni
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash.

Which is better, MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 37.9 to 27.4. MiMo-V2-Omni is made by Xiaomi and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2-Omni compare to Qwen3.8 Omni Flash in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores PinchBench: 81.2%, SWE-Bench Verified: 74.8%, Claw-Eval: 54.8%, MM-BrowserComp: 52.0%, OmniGAIA: 49.8%. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash scores VoiceBench Avg: 91.6%, DailyOmni: 85.1%, MMAU: 81.8%, OmniGAIA: 74.0%, WildClawBench: 71.0%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

MiMo-V2-Omni supports 262K tokens and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (27.4 vs 37.9). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

MiMo-V2-Omni is developed by Xiaomi and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons