MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen3.7-Plus
MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3.7-Plus are closely matched at 35.6 and 42.5 on the LLM Stats Score. Qwen3.7-Plus is 2.7x cheaper per token.
Xiaomi · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3.7-Plus are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 35.6 and 42.5.
In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.7-Plus wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Qwen3.7-Plus is roughly 2.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose MiMo-V2-Pro
- you want predictable pricing at $1.00/M input and $3.00/M output
Choose Qwen3.7-Plus
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 2.7x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
7 reported for MiMo-V2-Pro · 70 for Qwen3.7-Plus
MiMo-V2-Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while Qwen3.7-Plus is better at 3 benchmarks (Claw-Eval, SWE-bench Multilingual, Terminal-Bench 2.0).
Qwen3.7-Plus shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, MiMo-V2-Pro ($1.00/1M tokens) is 3.1x more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus ($0.32/1M tokens).
For output processing, MiMo-V2-Pro ($3.00/1M tokens) is 2.3x more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus ($1.28/1M tokens).
In conclusion, MiMo-V2-Pro is more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.7-Plus can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Pro is limited to 16,384 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Qwen3.7-Plus supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Pro does not.
Qwen3.7-Plus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
MiMo-V2-Pro
Qwen3.7-Plus
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiMo-V2-Pro was released on 2026-03-18, while Qwen3.7-Plus was released on 2026-05-31.
Qwen3.7-Plus is 2 months newer than MiMo-V2-Pro.
Mar 18, 2026
6 months ago
May 31, 2026
4 months ago
2mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
MiMo-V2-Pro is available from Xiaomi. Qwen3.7-Plus is available from Together, Fireworks.
MiMo-V2-Pro
Qwen3.7-Plus
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3.7-Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen3.7-Plus.