The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Parse

Comparing MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Parse across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Xiaomi · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Parse trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Parse

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.43 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.87 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
8,192

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for MiMo-V2.5-Pro · 1 for Parse

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Parsedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1020.9B diff

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 1020.9B more parameters than Parse, making it 44388.9% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
1.0Tparameters
Cohere
Parse
2.3Bparameters
1023.2B
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
2.3B
Parse

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Parse's 8,192 tokens. Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Cohere
Parse
Input8,192 tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Parse supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not.

Parse can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Parse

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is licensed under MIT, while Parse uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Parse

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27, while Parse was released on 2026-08-27.

Parse is 4 months newer than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Apr 27, 2026

4 months ago

Parse

Aug 27, 2026

3 days ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available from Xiaomi, DeepInfra, Novita. Parse is available from Azure, Cohere.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.43/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.87/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M

Parse

azure logo
Azure
cohere logo
Cohere
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Parse side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro
✓ Preferred
Parse
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Parse.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Parse?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi) and Parse (Cohere) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does MiMo-V2.5-Pro compare to Parse in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores FrontierSWE (Impl.): 100.0%, GSM8k: 99.6%, ARC-C: 97.2%, MMLU-Redux: 92.8%, C-Eval: 91.5%. Parse scores ParseBench: 79.2%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Parse?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Parse supports 8K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Parse?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 8K), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Parse?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and Parse is developed by Cohere.