The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash are closely matched at 35.9 and 37.8 on the LLM Stats Score.

Xiaomi · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 35.9 and 37.8.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.5

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
35.9
#95
37.8
#79
Reasoning
35.4
#92
32.2
#117
Agents
20.8
#74
21.0
#73
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.17 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.34 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for MiMo-V2.5 · 5 for Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

1 shared

MiMo-V2.5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is better at 1 benchmark (DailyOmni).

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.5 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only MiMo-V2.5 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.5 is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3.8 Omni Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.5

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.5 was released on 2026-04-22, while Qwen3.8 Omni Flash was released on 2026-09-18.

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 5 months newer than MiMo-V2.5.

MiMo-V2.5

Apr 22, 2026

5 months ago

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Sep 18, 2026

2 weeks ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.5
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 35.9 and 37.8. MiMo-V2.5 is made by Xiaomi and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.5 compare to Qwen3.8 Omni Flash in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.5 scores HR-Bench (4k): 88.5%, Video-MME: 87.7%, OmniDocBench: 87.2%, GraphWalks: 87.0%, DailyOmni: 83.5%. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash scores VoiceBench Avg: 91.6%, DailyOmni: 85.1%, MMAU: 81.8%, OmniGAIA: 74.0%, WildClawBench: 71.0%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

MiMo-V2.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (35.9 vs 37.8), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

MiMo-V2.5 is developed by Xiaomi and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons