The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 21.0.

Xiaomi · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 21.0, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.05/M input and $0.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
45.7
#29
21.0
#193
Reasoning
43.2
#42
19.7
#197
Coding
36.6
#21
0.6
#241
Agents
33.3
#25
-6.7
#185
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.05 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Tool use
28.1#22
-1.9#185
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 15 for Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

277.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 277.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B), making it 865.6% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
32.0Bparameters
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
32.0B
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 9 months newer than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

9mo newer
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Dec 15, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-11-28, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s training data extends to 2025-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

—

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Nov 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 21.0. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare to Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) scores AIME 2025: 99.2%, WMT24++: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 78.3%, GPQA: 75.0%, LiveCodeBench v6: 68.3%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports an unknown number of tokens and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.7 vs 21.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (MIT vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons