The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Phi 4 Mini

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -4.1.

Xiaomi · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -4.1, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Phi 4 Mini

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
45.7
#29
-4.1
#350
Reasoning
43.2
#42
-4.2
#342
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 17 for Phi 4 Mini

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Phi 4 Minidon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

305.2B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 305.2B more parameters than Phi 4 Mini, making it 7946.9% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini
3.8Bparameters
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
3.8B
Phi 4 Mini

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Mini does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Phi 4 Mini

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while Phi 4 Mini was released on 2025-02-01.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 20 months newer than Phi 4 Mini.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

1.6yr newer
Phi 4 Mini

Feb 1, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Mini's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

—

Phi 4 Mini

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Phi 4 Mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Phi 4 Mini.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Phi 4 Mini?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -4.1. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi and Phi 4 Mini is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare to Phi 4 Mini in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%. Phi 4 Mini scores GSM8k: 88.6%, ARC-C: 83.7%, BoolQ: 81.2%, OpenBookQA: 79.2%, PIQA: 77.6%.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Phi 4 Mini?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.7 vs -4.1), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Phi 4 Mini?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and Phi 4 Mini is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons