The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniCPM-SALA vs o1-pro

o1-pro leads the LLM Stats Score 19.7 to 14.4.

OpenBMB · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

o1-pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 19.7 to 14.4, ranking #207 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, o1-pro wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniCPM-SALA

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose o1-pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 19.7 and ranks #207 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiniCPM-SALA
OpenBMB
o1-pro
OpenAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
14.4
#244
19.7
#207
Reasoning
15.7
#229
20.0
#198
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

24 reported for MiniCPM-SALA · 2 for o1-pro

1 shared

MiniCPM-SALA outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o1-pro is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2024).

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

o1-pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniCPM-SALA does not.

o1-pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiniCPM-SALA

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1-pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiniCPM-SALA is licensed under Apache 2.0, while o1-pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiniCPM-SALA

Apache 2.0

Open weights

o1-pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniCPM-SALA was released on 2026-02-11, while o1-pro was released on 2024-12-17.

MiniCPM-SALA is 14 months newer than o1-pro.

MiniCPM-SALA

Feb 11, 2026

7 months ago

1.2yr newer
o1-pro

Dec 17, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o1-pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while MiniCPM-SALA's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o1-pro's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniCPM-SALA's cutoff date.

MiniCPM-SALA

—

o1-pro

Sep 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniCPM-SALA and o1-pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniCPM-SALA
✓ Preferred
o1-pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniCPM-SALA vs o1-pro.

Which is better, MiniCPM-SALA or o1-pro?

o1-pro leads the LLM Stats Score 19.7 to 14.4. MiniCPM-SALA is made by OpenBMB and o1-pro is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiniCPM-SALA compare to o1-pro in benchmarks?

MiniCPM-SALA scores HumanEval: 95.1%, RULER 64k: 92.7%, RULER 128k: 89.4%, MBPP: 89.1%, RULER 512K: 87.1%. o1-pro scores AIME 2024: 86.0%, GPQA: 79.0%.

What are the main differences between MiniCPM-SALA and o1-pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (14.4 vs 19.7), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniCPM-SALA and o1-pro?

MiniCPM-SALA is developed by OpenBMB and o1-pro is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons