The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniMax M2.1 vs Parse

Comparing MiniMax M2.1 and Parse across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

MiniMax · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M2.1 and Parse trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

MiniMax M2.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniMax M2.1

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Parse

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
8,192

Individual benchmarks

25 reported for MiniMax M2.1 · 1 for Parse

No common benchmarks found

MiniMax M2.1 and Parsedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

227.7B diff

MiniMax M2.1 has 227.7B more parameters than Parse, making it 9900.0% larger.

MiniMax
MiniMax M2.1
230.0Bparameters
Cohere
Parse
2.3Bparameters
230.0B
MiniMax M2.1
2.3B
Parse

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiniMax M2.1 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Parse's 8,192 tokens. Only MiniMax M2.1 specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).

MiniMax
MiniMax M2.1
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Cohere
Parse
Input8,192 tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Parse supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M2.1 does not.

Parse can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiniMax M2.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Parse

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiniMax M2.1 is licensed under MIT, while Parse uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiniMax M2.1

MIT

Open weights

Parse

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M2.1 was released on 2025-12-23, while Parse was released on 2026-08-27.

Parse is 8 months newer than MiniMax M2.1.

MiniMax M2.1

Dec 23, 2025

8 months ago

Parse

Aug 27, 2026

4 days ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiniMax M2.1 is available from MiniMax. Parse is available from Azure, Cohere.

MiniMax M2.1

minimax logo
MiniMax
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Parse

azure logo
Azure
cohere logo
Cohere
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniMax M2.1 and Parse side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniMax M2.1
✓ Preferred
Parse
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M2.1 vs Parse.

Which is better, MiniMax M2.1 or Parse?

MiniMax M2.1 (MiniMax) and Parse (Cohere) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does MiniMax M2.1 compare to Parse in benchmarks?

MiniMax M2.1 scores VIBE Web: 91.5%, VIBE Android: 89.7%, VIBE: 88.6%, MMLU-Pro: 88.0%, VIBE iOS: 88.0%. Parse scores ParseBench: 79.2%.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M2.1 and Parse?

MiniMax M2.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Parse supports 8K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M2.1 and Parse?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 8K), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniMax M2.1 and Parse?

MiniMax M2.1 is developed by MiniMax and Parse is developed by Cohere.