Model Comparison
MiniMax M3 vs GLM-5.2Which is better in 2026?
GLM-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiniMax M3 is 2.8x cheaper per token.
Verdict: MiniMax M3 vs GLM-5.2 — which is better?
MiniMax M3 (by MiniMax) and GLM-5.2 (by Zhipu AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
MiniMax M3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (PostTrainBench), while GLM-5.2 is better at 4 benchmarks (MCP Atlas, NL2Repo, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1). GLM-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, MiniMax M3 is roughly 2.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
GLM-5.2 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose MiniMax M3 if…
- cost matters — it's about 2.8x cheaper per token
Choose GLM-5.2 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 5 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2026
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
MiniMax M3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (PostTrainBench), while GLM-5.2 is better at 4 benchmarks (MCP Atlas, NL2Repo, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1).
GLM-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, MiniMax M3 ($0.30/1M tokens) is 3.2x cheaper than GLM-5.2 ($0.95/1M tokens).
For output processing, MiniMax M3 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than GLM-5.2 ($3.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GLM-5.2 is more expensive than MiniMax M3.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
GLM-5.2 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to MiniMax M3's 512,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
MiniMax M3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5.2 does not.
MiniMax M3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
MiniMax M3
GLM-5.2
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under MIT.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
MIT
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiniMax M3 was released on 2026-06-01, while GLM-5.2 was released on 2026-06-16.
GLM-5.2 is 1 month newer than MiniMax M3.
Jun 1, 2026
1 months ago
Jun 16, 2026
1 months ago
2w newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
MiniMax M3 is available from Fireworks, Novita, Together, MiniMax. GLM-5.2 is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, FriendliAI, Novita, Together, ZAI.
MiniMax M3
GLM-5.2
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
MiniMax M3
View detailsMiniMax
GLM-5.2
View detailsZhipu AI
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against MiniMax M3 and GLM-5.2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about MiniMax M3 vs GLM-5.2.